Comments on: #11 Non-Fiction And The Hatred Of Fiction

By: Violet Black

Violet Black — Sat, 18 Feb 2012 09:41:57 +0000

It’s quite funny that this one describes me, given that I am hoping to be a professional fiction writer myself someday. I can spend the whole day lost on the TV Tropes Wiki or on websites reviewing a book/movie, but actually reading/watching it gets put at the very bottom of my to-do queue along with other “time-wasting” activities. The way my reasoning goes, I do not need the entertainment, but I could use a primer on how other authors think the world/human psyche works and how closely that matches objective reality. I approach everything as if it were sci-fi, continually fretting about realism even when the best advice my friends and family can give is “willing suspension of disbelief”. But really, how is anyone going to take my distant-future alien Jurrasic-Park-like pseudo-re-creation of Earth society seriously if the girl imprinted with a 3D scan from the memories of a 21st-century abuse victim’s brain doesn’t react realistically to being hit on by a retrovirus-popping shapeshifter who is doing his most obnoxious Cthulhu impression due to his own pathological control issues?
It is often said that if you want to write well, you have to read quite a bit as a learning exercise (preferably in the genre you wish to write in), but I get complimented on the little snippets I share even without all that. It may be all the non-fiction reading I do that reinforces my linguistic competence (such as it is), or maybe they are just being nice. I like to think I can get away with not “imitating” anyone, and I definitely hope I can get away with not following the conventions of these “genre” things, which may not be worth sustaining anyhow. By Aspie logic, if a certain storytelling device proves to be dishonest to readers, why spread it?
My Mommy says she likes my work because of all the “detail” and the fact that I obviously have a vivid visual imagination. In fact, I don’t know any other way of doing things, and it’s not something that could be easily taught in books. I can read a textbook and visualize all of it (or not visualize it, which would be synonymous with not understanding it for me), or I could read and similarly visualize fiction but get a smaller data-to-fluff ratio.

By: Bryan

Bryan — Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:46:34 +0000

I adore fiction–so long as it is either comic books or part of a very strong and deep internal universe.

By: Ettina

Ettina — Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:11:44 +0000

I’m actually quite obsessed with fiction, specifically science fiction and fantasy. I’d like to be an author someday.

I do like non-fiction books if they’re about psychology (my special interest). But I like them in a totally different way than fiction.

By: Amy

Amy — Fri, 05 Aug 2011 12:59:49 +0000

This describes exactly how I feel. Despite repeated attempts to find pleasure and value in works of fiction, I still find it a laborious waste of time. I pine for the relaxation and mental enjoyment fiction appears to gift its readers with, and hoped it would provide a welcomed reprieve from the unrelenting mental activity that dominates my waking hours. But it doesn’t. I just don’t value it.

My aspie kids, however, are huge fiction fans (sci-fi and fantasy). One is a gifted fiction writer– stories pour forth from her pen like water from a spring. It’s remarkable.

By: Courtney

Courtney — Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:28:15 +0000

…have to say that so far this is the only one that doesn’t fit me.

Well, don’t have to actually, but felt compelled to.

By: Craig

Craig — Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:11:51 +0000

I’m also a big fan of fiction; in fact, my college major was English Literature, and I’m an aspie. I think this mostly comes from my interest in characters as archetypes. I like trying to categorize the stories I read and the characters in them. Also, fiction helps me connect with and make greater sense of my emotional side, and that’s something all aspies can benefit from.

It’s true that most aspergers hobbies tend to be based more on reason that emotion, but that’s not always the case. Besides, literature definitely lends itself to analysis. However, it takes some learning to really appreciate fiction and dissect it in such a manner.

More in line with this post, I’m definitely a non-fiction writer. I’d much rather write about how to do things, or write essays and scientific reports, than write fiction. I can never think of enough detail, and my fiction always comes out feeling dry and devoid of emotion (a bit like Isaac Asimov, but less brilliant).

By: David-Saladin

David-Saladin — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:00:38 +0000

I love both, but I noticed along time ago that my affinity with fiction has to do with analyzing the writer/characters. Like I try to read the writers mind at the time the writing took place, as well as escaping into the story, but not so much the latter…

By: Dan

Dan — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:55:51 +0000

It’s true that not every stereotypical trait describes every Aspie. However, some tests have some parts of the adult criteria based on the adult not enjoying or having interest in fiction. But, as stated in the post, literature is a “special interest” for a lot of Aspies. This site describes me exactly.

By: Danechi

Danechi — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:54:22 +0000

I’m flaming autistic (diagnosed Asperger’s, but tend to fit dx’ed classic autistics’ self-descriptions far, far better), and this doesn’t fit me at all! (Nor does a lot of the stuff on this site, really.)

I love both fiction and non-fiction, and while my interests in fiction tend toward science fiction and fantasy, that’s more out of escapism and general love for such universes rather than anything relating to basis in fact. I don’t like romance novels and don’t care for mass-produced spy thrillers, but those are close to my only limitations in what I’ll read.

I know other auties with an extreme love for fiction. It’s not all that rare. In contrast, my mostly non-autistic father (described as non-autistic by people at Autreat, which helps seal it, I think), refuses to read fiction. I think that the purported NT/AS divide based on this criterion is *mostly* based upon stereotypes.